On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 03:42:41PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Nathan Torkington wrote:
>
> > When an article
> > in perl.com is so overwhelmingly negative about the work so far, do
Yup. I can't see www.sun.com carrying an editorial saying effectively
"Java: we are all going to hell in a handbasket". Well, maybe they
are, precisely because of Java, but that's not the point here...
> > you think that stirs confidence in what we're doing?
>
> To strive for balance, I think perl.com's home page should also have the
> links to Larry's ALS talk and slides. I know they are not a polished
Definitely.
> collection of web pages, but they are still quite readable. They also
> give a different perspective to the RFC collection.
>
> An article emphasizing positive aspects of the process so far would also
> seem like a nice idea, but somebody'd have to write it :-).
I think I will try my hand at this.
> --
> Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dept. of Physics
> Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
