Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs

[Branden]

Edward Peschko wrote:
> How about 'an implicit parens around a set of statements separated by
commas
> in any context'? This is consistent
>
> $a, $b, $c = $d, $e, $f; # ($a, $b, $c) = ($d, $e, $f);
>

I guess this should be

    $a, $b, ($c = $d), $e, $f

I think making `my' work just the same as `print' would be good. When you
want to my and assign an array of variables you would just

    my($a, $b, $c) = @_;

or

    (my $a, $b, $c) = @_;

The case

    my $a, $b, $c = @_;

should be

    my $a, $b, ($c = @_);

which for that case of @_=(1..10) should result in $c==3, which is the
expected.

Both ways are possible though.

- Branden