<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tie (my $shoe) => $string; > > Not enough arguments for tie... > tie +(my $shoe) => $string; This is the same as would happen to `print', for example. Or else, the easyer tie my($shoe) => $string; It doesn't look like a function, so it isn't. > > Ah, more pointless changes with perl5. > If this makes `my' DWIM, I think it's not pointless... - Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Peter Scott
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs Nathan Wiger
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for subs abigail
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... abigail
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... abigail
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... abigail
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Edward Peschko
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Simon Cozens
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... John Porter
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope for ... Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Branden
- Re: Closures and default lexical-scope ... Branden