On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 10:31 AM 3/2/2001 -0800, Hong Zhang wrote: > > > Integer data types are generically referred to as C<INT>s. There is an > > > C<INT> typedef that is guaranteed to hold any integer type. > > > The intention is that if you need to deal with integers in an abstract way, > you'll use a variable of type INT. That way if you get handed an IV or a > bigint pointer, both will fit fine. Ah. I misread that too. You may safely ignore my question about INT as "long long" then. -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
- PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Andy Dougherty
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types wiz
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal d... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Intern... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal d... NeonEdge
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Intern... Hong Zhang
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: In... Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Andy Dougherty
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark