At 12:21 PM 3/2/2001 -0800, Hong Zhang wrote: >I believe we should use low bits for tagging. It will make switch >case much faster. That's pretty much what I intended. The only reason not to have them as the low bits is if there's some other field that uses multiple bits, and optimizing for that field buys us more of a win than the type. Single bit fields can go anywhere, since I don't think it really matters which bit gets used there. Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data ty... Andy Dougherty
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal data ty... wiz
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Internal dat... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Interna... Nicholas Clark
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Int... Dan Sugalski
- RE: Questions about PDD 4: Interna... NeonEdge
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Int... Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Andy Dougherty
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data t... Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski