At 12:05 PM 3/2/2001 -0800, Hong Zhang wrote: > > >at some > > >points it becomes necessary to have an unsigned type for "the largest > > >integer" which in this case would be 72 bits. > > >[and on a machine with nothing larger than 32 will be 32] > > > > Sure. The size of an INT will probably be either 32 or 64 bits, depending > > both on the size of an IV and the size of a pointer for the target >machine. >By the way, on OS/400, the pointer is 128 bit and may not be cast between >int >and void*. Gack. 128 bits for a pointer? Never mind. (The casting issue isn't a problem if the thing you're casting into is of the largest type) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Questions about PDD 4: Int... Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Andy Dougherty
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Nicholas Clark
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Uri Guttman
- PDD X: Perl API conventions Paolo Molaro
- Re: PDD X: Perl API conventions Damien Neil
- Re: PDD X: Perl API conventions Stephen P. Potter
- Re: PDD X: Perl API conventions Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD X: Perl API conventions Paolo Molaro
- Re: PDD X: Perl API conventions Damien Neil
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Dan Sugalski
- Re: PDD 4: Internal data types Hong Zhang