Or, rather, I think we should have one. Naming the interpreter separate from the language may help folks keep the various bits separate in their minds. (It'll certainly help me be clearer when I talk about it) Personally, I'm up for calling the interpreter "Parrot" unless someone has an objection... Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: So, we need a code name... Dan Sugalski
- Re: So, we need a code name... Branden
- Re: So, we need a code name... Dan Sugalski
- Re: So, we need a code name... Mike Stok
- RE: So, we need a code name... NeonEdge
- RE: So, we need a code name... Dan Sugalski
- Re: So, we need a code name... Uri Guttman
- RE: So, we need a code name... Andy Dougherty
- Re: So, we need a code name... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: So, we need a code name... Bart Lateur
- Re: So, we need a code name... Johan Vromans