At 12:35 PM 4/24/2001 -0300, Branden wrote:
>At 11:27 AM 24/04/2001 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>Or, rather, I think we should have one. Naming the interpreter separate
>>from the language may help folks keep the various bits separate in their
>>minds. (It'll certainly help me be clearer when I talk about it)
>
>Actually, I think the language (the syntax) is becoming so much different
>than Perl 5, that I think we would need another name for the language as
>well... :-(
That particular issue is Someone Else's Problem, luckily for me. :)
If it becomes a big issue, consider it a reason to get the perl 5
compatible parser written... :)
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
