On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:03:50AM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 03:33:52PM -0700, Edward Peschko wrote: > > > I think its really time to have a vote on this > > Aaargh. I don't. Wouldn't you rather wait and see what Larry is > planning with all this? I doubt the proposed changes are gratuitous, > and I think he's got a pretty good track record with these sorts of > things. My guess is that the majority of the intent is to go for compatibility with other HLL, and for simplicity. Although perhaps that is not the whole story... > Anyway, what do you think this is? Some kind of democracy? > > :) well, that's the standard code for 'its time for a decision from larry' isn't it? ;-) Ed
- Dot can DWIM without whitespace Brent Dax
- C or SH like string cat proposal David L. Nicol
- Re: C or SH like string cat proposal Michael G Schwern
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Stephen P. Potter
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Michael G Schwern
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Dan Sugalski
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Dave
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Simon Cozens
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Paul Johnson
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespac... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Dot can DWIM without white... Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without w... Buddha Buck
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Simon Cozens
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespace Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespac... Casey West
- Re: Dot can DWIM without white... Edward Peschko
- Re: Dot can DWIM without whitespac... Michael G Schwern