Re: Apoc2 - concerns

[Nathan Wiger]

* Simon Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/07/2001 13:46]:
>
> > To quote you:
> > : http://dev.perl.org/rfc/28.pod
> > 
> > I'm not trying to be a jerk at all, but I think at times we're losing
> > sight of the above.
> 
> I hope not, since it was primarily written with you in mind. :)

Hmm, that's odd. As I recall I was one of the most fervent proponents of
RFC 28:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/perl6-language@perl.org/msg00778.html

Or did you mean something else?

If you read my RFC's with a "this guy loves Perl" mindset I think you'll
find most all of them are not actually that radical. The only ones that
are really "out there" are ones like RFC 159, but even that's designed
to be hidden under the hood.

But I think we're getting a little off-topic...

-Nate