Hi, El vie., 14 sept. 2018 a las 7:11, Todd Chester (<toddandma...@zoho.com>) escribió:
> > > On 09/11/2018 05:05 AM, Simon Proctor wrote: > > Please note the Perl5 docs have had decades of people working on them > > the Perl6 ones.... less so. There's bound to be some difference in scope. > > Hi Simon, > > That you for the tutorial. I have it tagged to read over again > really SSSLLLOOOWWLY > > As for P5's and P6's documentation, I don't think it is a case of > not having a lot of time to refine things. I think it is > difference in approach: I think P6's expects the reader > to have developer level knowledge and P5 tries explain how > to use the function in simple terms that common users > can understand. > > As I figure things out, I write my own notes. I am closing > in on 200 of them now. I hit them all the time. After > a while, things sink in and I don't have to look. > > After my first attempt at improving "contains" description, > I am not sure it is worth the effort. It is my impression > that those maintaining these references will not budge. > > Last time I counted, there were a dozen comments and 3 commits in the issue I created to try and improve the description. 2 files were modified by me. That's rather a dynamic way of not budging. Cheers JJ
