Sterin, Ilya wrote: > But I thought this was related to more than just with(), so if we have > > ### Would now have to be printed as > > print "This is number "; > print; > print " of 10\n"; > > I still believe that although not defining a variable source will use the > temp variable there is still a need for an explicit scalar like $_. > Unless there is something I am missing from this discussion. No. with() must be consistent with other perl constructs. If implemented, it will use $_. Plain and simple. -- John Porter
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Jeremy Howard
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] John Porter
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Bart Lateur
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] jh_lists
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Stuart Rocks
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Stuart Rocks
- RE: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Stuart Rocks
- RE: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Sterin, Ilya
- RE: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] John Porter
- RE: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Sterin, Ilya
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] John Porter
- Re: aliasing - was:[nice2haveit] Me
- Please sign me off Alice Li