On Friday 31 August 2001 01:13 am, Brent Dax wrote: > Cool--I'd suggest a special $*CODE filehandle, to match $*DATA (that > isn't going away, is it?). IIRC, $*DATA is going away, in favor of something a little more Inline::File-ish - i.e., an arbitrary number of arbitrarily named pseudohandles. But there's probably no reason that $*CODE couldn't specifically refer to the entire file. -- Bryan C. Warnock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Source/Program metadata from within a program Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a program Dave Storrs
- RE: Source/Program metadata from within a program Brent Dax
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a progr... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a progr... Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a progr... John Porter
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a program Michael G Schwern
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a progr... Bryan C . Warnock
- RE: Source/Program metadata from within a program Brent Dax
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a progr... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a progr... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a p... Michael G Schwern
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a program John Porter
- Re: Source/Program metadata from within a progr... Michael G Schwern
- RE: Source/Program metadata from within a program Garrett Goebel