On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 11:27:39AM +1100, Damian Conway wrote: > > The $64K question then being: can I call it like so: > > > > ($obj1, $obj2)->foo(@args); > > Is that merely sugar for: > > # errr, $_.foo(@args) ? > $_->foo(@args) foreach($obj1, $obj2); > > or is there something more interesting going on? > > Maybe we need a method call hyperoperator. I didn't just say that. > > > > PS: I'd just like to point out that people gasped in horror when > > I presented this idea at YAPC::NA::2001 as part of the > > (soon-to-be-released) Klingon binding of Perl. ;-) > > I'll add my own, now.
Does this mean that the caller of a multimethod has to know he calls a multimethod (as oposed to a regular method). Should not the user of a library spared from such implementation details, however sexy they are? > > -- > > Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ > Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One > My breasts are arousing weapons. -- Stéphane Payrard -- s.payrard@@wanadoo.fr
