On Sun 20 Jan, Me wrote: > > On Saturday 19 January 2002 22:05, Brent Dax wrote: > > > Is this list of special blocks complete and correct? > > > > > > BEGIN Executes at the beginning of compilation > > > CHECK Executes at the end of compilation > > > INIT Executes at the beginning of run > > > END Executes at the end of run > > > PRE Executes at beginning of block entry > > > POST Executes at end of block entry > > > NEXT Executes on call to next() within current block > > > CATCH Executes on exception within current block > > > KEEP Executes on normal exit of the current block > > > UNDO Executes on "un-normal" exit of the current block > > - LAST > (Per Damian's last (LAST/POST) post.) > > - FIRST? > (Symmetry.) > > - ALWAYS? > (Another plausible addition. Rounds out PRE and POST > with invariant assertions that get checked twice, once at > the time PRE does, once at the time POST does. > Personally I'd leave this out until it became clear, well > past p6.0, whether it was really worth it, but it seems > worth mentioning.). >
To complete such a list perhaps there is a case for: NEVER :-) Richard -- Personal Work - Waveney Consulting Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://www.waveney.org http://www.WaveneyConsulting.com Independent Telecommunications Consultant, ATM expert, Web Analyst
