Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At 2:33 PM +0100 4/7/02, Piers Cawley wrote: >>"Jonathan E. Paton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> but wait, there's more... what does: >>> >>> @multi_dim[$a][$b][$c] >>> >>> give? >> >>Who cares? So long as the intermediate results in >>@multi_dim.[$a].[$b].[$c] respond to []. > > Hrm. Will they need to? That could arguably pass a three element key > ($a,$b,$c) to @multi_dim which, conveniently being a three-dimensional > array, returns a value itself.
Oh ghod. I'm getting confused now. -- Piers "It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite." -- Jane Austen?