Dan Sugalski wrote: > > At 10:41 PM -0400 5/17/02, Jeff wrote: > >I'm about ready to commit the fixes to the current assembler, which will > >finally make proper keyed aggregate access ready. Looking at the test > >suite, I see some places where we use raw opcode names, such as > >'ne_n_nc_ic'. It appears to be random, and I'd like to know if keeping > >the ability to access raw opcode names is of any use? I personally don't > >think so, beyond the dubious benefit of being able to validate that you > >meant the opcode you typed in. > > Don't forget autogenerated assembly. Could be useful there. > > >I'm tempted to simply rewrite the tests properly (t/op/ifunless, > >t/op/number, t/op/stacks, and t/op/time) to use the proper opcode. > >Thoughts, anyone? > > Go ahead and rewrite things--that's fine.
Done, checked in, and back to work on the assembler. Still got one or two minor hiccups but I'll get it taken care of this weekend, definitely. -- Jeff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
