Dan Sugalski wrote: > These 'add-on' bytecode interpreters don't get any special > consideration in the core. That means they *can* have: > > *) A custom bytecode loader to translate their bytecode format > to ours, or something we can use > *) As many custom PMC classes as they want > *) Dynamically loaded custom opcode functions > > They *don't* get: > > *) Changes to fundamental core behaviour (like refcounting > garbage collection)
I like it! Thanks, Dan. -- John Douglas Porter __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com
