On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 07:25:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Do you have a working Perl6Grammar:
> 
> $ perl6 -vwk -e'print qq(Hello parrot\n)'
> P6C '__eval__'
> .../imcc/imcc   -verbose    -o__eval__.pasm __eval__.imc
> Reading __eval__.imc
> using optimization '0'
> assembly module __eval__.pasm written.
> 481 lines compiled.
> assembling perl ../../assemble.pl  __eval__.pasm -o __eval__.pbc
> running: /home/lt/src/parrot-leo/parrot  __eval__.pbc
> Hello parrot
> 

Looks good.

> 
> If something fails you shuld see more details here.
> 
> To be sure, that grammar is ok, run above line with
> 
> $ perl6 -vwk -e'print qq(Hello parrot\n)' --force-grammar
> 

Looks ok

> If that succeeds try:
> 
> $ perl6 --test
>

Looks bad as above

> $ perl6 --test -r
>

psinnott@migo:/tmp/parrot/languages/perl6$ ./perl6 --test -r
Test details:
t/builtins/array.t........2/3
t/builtins/string.t.......4/4
t/compiler/1.t..........13/13
t/compiler/2.t............5/5
t/compiler/3.t............7/7
t/compiler/4.t............3/3
t/compiler/5.t............5/5
t/compiler/6.t............6/6warning:imcc:parser: file
t/compiler/6_6.imc line 11: _SV_i2 already defined

t/compiler/7.t............1/1
t/compiler/8.t............6/6
t/compiler/9.t............4/4
t/compiler/a.t............3/3
t/compiler/b.t............2/2
t/compiler/qsort.t........1/1
t/rx/basic.t..............6/6
t/rx/call.t...............2/2
t/rx/special.t............2/2

Test summary:
t/builtins/array.....ok
        2/3 skipped: various reasons
        t/builtins/string....ok
        t/compiler/1.........ok
        t/compiler/2.........ok
        t/compiler/3.........ok
        t/compiler/4.........ok
        t/compiler/5.........ok
        t/compiler/6.........ok
        t/compiler/7.........ok
        t/compiler/8.........ok
        t/compiler/9.........ok
        t/compiler/a.........ok
        t/compiler/b.........ok
        t/compiler/qsort.....ok
        t/rx/basic...........ok
        t/rx/call............ok
        t/rx/special.........ok
        All tests successful, 2 subtests skipped.
        Files=17, Tests=73,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.07 cusr +  0.05 csys =
        0.12 CPU)
        WHOA!  Somehow you got a different number of results than tests
        ran!
        This should never happen!  Please contact the author
        immediately!

-- 
Our challenge is to interactively maintain world-class sources in order 
to conveniently administrate low-risk high-yield resources while maintaining 
the highest standards

Reply via email to