Andrew Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:16:53PM -0600, Jonathan Scott Duff wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 12:06:13PM -0600, Garrett Goebel wrote: > > > Or if the leading = really must be required: > > > > > > =*> level1 > > > =>> level2 > > > =+>>> level3 > > > =*>>>> level4 > > > =>>> level3 > > > => level1 > > I don't like this much, I think it looks untidy. We're you > planning to make the indentation mandatory?
Nope not mandatory, just easier on the reader's eyes it the author choses to do so... I don't imagine most people would switch back and forth between unordered and ordered list. So an example similar to Scott's could be: =* => level1 =>> level2 =>>> level3 =>>>> level4 =>>> level3 =>> level2 => level1 and =+ => level1 =>> level2 =>>> level3 =>>>> level4 =>>> level3 =>> level2 => level1 Assuming =* and =+ toggle the list unordered/ordered default. The =*> syntax would assumably allow you to toggle the default for a specific level... I'd be glad to take this off-list for anyone who'd like to continue this thread... Garrett
