> Yes, but > > my int $foo is constant; > > Is self-explanatory for many language-speakers. If I recall, > the set of cross-language-programmers is a proper subset of > the set of language-speakers. It is clear which is clearer :).
You do "proof by best case scenario". In my previous posting i showed how this can become complicated to read when the list grows. To language-speakers: Why isn't my example language-speaker conform: my <wise> <uncles> ( john, james, jim and tony ) are ( 42, 77, 32, 34 ). is a template for my <property> <type> ($john, $james, $jim, $tony ) = ( 42, 77, 32, 34 ); could be in real world: my Application('Bricolage') USER ( $john, $james, $jim, $tony ) = ( 'john camel', 'james content', 'jim parrot', 'tony perl' ; Excerpt: why don't catch two mosquitos with one snatch... easy c++/java and language-speaker migration. Murat