Andy Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote:
>> more errors like this: t/op/interp_1.pasm and t/op/gc_1.t are the ones >> I know of. We will have much fun with bugs like this. > This might be another one -- t/op/gc_2.pasm is simply [ ... ] > I'm lost. Any suggestions? Probably a similar problem. During initialization the PIO subsystem creates the stdio objects, which are marked needing timely destruction. Now when you run a PASM file the code paths are different and some more PMCs might get created first or in different order, as it is when running a .PBC directly - though I don't have an explanation for this observed behavior. To furhter nail this down, I would disable TRACE_SYSTEM_AREAS in dod.c first. > Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] leo