Re: Question about interpreter == NULL

[Juergen Boemmels]

Leopold Toetsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

[...]

> PIO_eprintf
> PIO_printf
> 
> for printing to stderr/stdout during 1st interpreter construction &
> destruction if something goes wrong. In all other cases we have an
> valid interpreter (or an parent interpreter if any).

This means all the Parrot_warn(NULL,...) in config/gen/platform/ansi.c
are invalid. Ok remove them

Index: config/gen/platform/ansi.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/public/parrot/config/gen/platform/ansi.c,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -r1.7 ansi.c
--- config/gen/platform/ansi.c  14 Jul 2003 07:58:20 -0000      1.7
+++ config/gen/platform/ansi.c  31 Jul 2003 19:22:42 -0000
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
 {
     /* unable to provide this level of precision under ANSI-C, so just fall
        back to intval time for this. */
-    Parrot_warn(NULL, PARROT_WARNINGS_PLATFORM_FLAG, "Parrot_floatval_time not 
accurate");
     return (FLOATVAL)Parrot_intval_time();
 }
 
@@ -39,7 +38,6 @@
 void
 Parrot_sleep(unsigned int seconds)
 {
-    Parrot_warn(NULL, PARROT_WARNINGS_PLATFORM_FLAG, "Parrot_sleep not implemented");
     return;
 }
 
@@ -92,7 +90,6 @@
 void *
 Parrot_dlopen(const char *filename)
 {
-    Parrot_warn(NULL, PARROT_WARNINGS_PLATFORM_FLAG, "Parrot_dlopen not implemented");
     return NULL;
 }
 
@@ -115,7 +112,6 @@
 void *
 Parrot_dlsym(void *handle, const char *symbol)
 {
-    Parrot_warn(NULL, PARROT_WARNINGS_PLATFORM_FLAG, "Parrot_dlsym not implemented");
     return NULL;
 }
 
@@ -127,7 +123,6 @@
 int
 Parrot_dlclose(void *handle)
 {
-    Parrot_warn(NULL, PARROT_WARNINGS_PLATFORM_FLAG, "Parrot_dlclose not 
implemented");
     return 0;
 }