Jeff Clites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 17, 2003, at 11:07 AM, Leopold Toetsch wrote:

>> *But*, when writing that stuff, one prelim was, that the compiler sees
>> all libs in the same sequence as runtime does. So above code (or your
>> second example) is illegal.

> Okay for now then. But long-term it seems pretty obvious that this will
> be too restrictive. Here are some specific problems:

Yep. That's right.

> Also, it's still a legitimate question, so for the third time I'll ask
> if ".Foo" is valid macro syntax?

Its just the constant syntax. A macro can expand to many lines, while a
constant is just one substitution.

> JEff

leo

Reply via email to