On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 12:46, Tels wrote: > I still think a big warning should be added to Test::More beeing _not_ a > drop-in replacement to Test.
I can only remember calling it a drop-in replacement for Test::Simple. -- c
- ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::More Tels
- Re: ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::More Adrian Howard
- Re: ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::More Andy Lester
- Re: ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::More Fergal Daly
- Re: ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::More Tels
- Re: ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::M... Fergal Daly
- Re: ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::M... chromatic
- Re: ok(1,1) vs. ok ('foo','foo') in Test::More Michael G Schwern
