On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:11:46PM -0500 it came to pass that Dan Sugalski wrote: > At 6:46 PM +0100 3/3/04, Jos Visser wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:37:09AM -0500 it came to pass that Dan > >Sugalski wrote: > >> > >> FWIW, if we start getting into the "What should our base time for the > >> epoch be" arguments, I'll warn you that the answer if I have to make > >> one is probably Nov 17, 1858 at midnight, give or take a bad memory, > >> and our time value'll be a 64-bit integer. So think carefully before > >> you go there. :) > > > >Nahhh.... Epoch should be 1-1-1970 at 12:00am midnight, > > Bzzzt! Wrong! :-P > > If we go non-platform-private, we're going to use the Smithsonian base date.
And catch countless people unawares? :-) ++Jos.es -- You are in America now. Speak Spanish!!!
