Larry Wall wrote:
We can certainly make it the default that a routine is not going to
do anything fancy with continuations unless it is explicitly declared
to allow it.  As to what that declaration should be, I have no idea.
Probably just a trait that says, "is continuationalizableish" or
some such.
"is mindwarping"? "does the_time_warp_again"?

The problem, in any case, is similar to "throws" in Java: if any of your children are marked, so shall you be, unto the Nth generation. (Or, at least, this is how I understand it.)

-=- James Mastros

Reply via email to