At 5:23 PM -0700 5/13/04, Jeff Clites wrote: [Most commentary snipped, as it's dead-on]
- When building / using a shared parrot the compiler macro PARROT_LIB_DYNAMIC will be defined, for static PARROT_LIB_STATIC
What will these be used for? Traditionally, there aren't compile-time difference when building a static v. dynamic library, I believe. Maybe this is not the case for Windows?
Hi,
I have little expertise in building libraries on many platforms. But aren't these issues all addressed by GNU's 'libtool'. Is there a licensing reason for not using that?
CU, Bernhard
-- ************************************************** Bernhard Schmalhofer Senior Developer Biomax Informatics AG Lochhamer Str. 11 82152 Martinsried, Germany Tel: +49 89 895574-839 Fax: +49 89 895574-825 eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Website: www.biomax.com **************************************************
