On Mon, 19 Jul 2004, Jonadab the Unsightly One wrote: > > If I extend the natural numbers N with Inf to a new set NI (N with > > Inf) > > The problem is, NI is not a group with respect to addition for any > definition of addition of which I am aware. Translated from mathese
In other words, or more briefly, and in many different contexts, it is well known that "Inf" can't be fully arithmetized... Michele -- > As you see, we have to conclude that either Cantor's "proofs" are > worthless wastes of ink, Or we can conclude that your posts are worthless waste of web space. - "Theorist" in sci.math, "Re: Cantor Paradox :-)" (slightly edited)
