"Ph. Marek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please take my words as my understanding, ie. with no connection to > mathmatics or number theory or whatever. I'll just say what I > believe is practical. [...] > I'd believe that infinity can be integer, ie. has no numbers after > the comma; and infinity is in the natural numbers (?), which are a > subset of integers.
If that were the case, 0/Inf would == 0. Also, if that were the case, 0..Inf would be a finite list. (It is trivial to prove that 0..N is a finite list with finite cardinality for all natural numbers N. So if you set N equal to Inf, 0..Inf would have finite cardinality, if Inf is a natural number.) This is obviously some new definition of Inf of which I was not previously aware. -- $;=sub{$/};@;=map{my($a,$b)=($_,$;);$;=sub{$a.$b->()}} split//,"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ --";$\=$ ;-> ();print$/