On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 02:16:50PM -0700, Jonathan Lang wrote:
: Funny you should mention that, especially considering the (relatively)
: recent discussion of revamping "sort", and noting that providing an
: "ordering" for a hash would essentially be the same as providing the hash
: with a "default" sorting mechanism.  

Er, that's what the last section of S9 was attempting to talk about...

Larry

Reply via email to