Dan Sugalski wrote:
At 10:07 AM +0100 11/4/04, Leopold Toetsch wrote:
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Attached patch makes building in the dynclass ghetto a bit less inhospitable...
Thanks, applied.
Are we comfortable adding the dynclasses to the default build target? I want to at some point, if only to make really sure that we don't break them. (As stuff that gets built and tested by default stays up to date, while the rest... tends not to)
The best way to find out is to add it.
I would prefer that this be added sooner rather than later, and now is as good a time as any.
Within a day or so, I should have an initial set of python PMCs that I would like to see committed, as well as the beginnings of a test suite.
- Sam Ruby
