I was having a look at CPANTS again this morning, and I noticed something rather strange.
There are now two kwalitee tests for 'has_test_pod' and 'has_test_pod_coverage'. These check that there are test scripts for POD correctness and POD coverage. These seem completely and utterly wrong to me. Surely the kwalitee checks should be purely that the POD is correct and sufficiently covers the module? Otherwise a distribution which has perfectly correct POD, which completely covers the module, is deemed to be of lesser kwalitee, and listed on CPANTS as having shortcomings. We should be very wary of stipulating HOW authors have to achieve their quality. Saying you can only check your POD in one specific way goes to far IMO. Tony
