Le jeudi 08 septembre 2005 à 10:45, Ovid écrivait: > > Myself, I was happy to see CPANTs and I "knew" I put out good quality > code, but in retrospect, I do see from the metrics that there are some > areas where I can improve. I do wonder, though, why Acme:: files are > included in there. The very nature of these modules frequently > guarantees that Kwalitee scores will be dragged down. Taking a less > than random example: > > Acme::Code::Police
Take a less random example: Acme::MetaSyntactic CPANTS Score: 17 > We should at least throw the poor module author's a bone and leave > Acme:: out of this. Hey! that would decrease *my* score! ;-) -- Philippe "BooK" Bruhat History is made by the winners and written by those with the loudest voices. (Moral from Groo The Wanderer #10 (Epic))