--- "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If that were universally true, we wouldnât have plaintext network > protocols, would we? And I think making TAP a protocol instead of > an API was the right choice.
As already noted, I freely admit I was wrong. If TAP was a "Perl only" thing, I might (might) be inclined to argue the point, but even then it's questionable. As a language-independent tool, an API is silly and I'm a fool for shooting my keyboard off for thinking only about the implementation problems as opposed to its benefits. Cheers, Ovid -- If this message is a response to a question on a mailing list, please send follow up questions to the list. Web Programming with Perl -- http://users.easystreet.com/ovid/cgi_course/
