On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[dynpmc] Replaced instances of INTERP (and one instance of intepreter) withinterp (trying to be consistent across the source).
At some point, INTERP must have meant something, no? Why was it INTERP and not interp before?
xoa -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
