On 28/06/07, Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 8:39 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > [dynpmc] Replaced instances of INTERP (and one instance of > intepreter) with > interp (trying to be consistent across the source). At some point, INTERP must have meant something, no? Why was it INTERP and not interp before?
Because things were quite inconsistently named before. There were instances of 'INTERP', 'interp' and 'interpreter' within the source code and a TODO item was created (ages ago) to fix this problem and it was decided to standardise everything to 'interp'. I'm just doing some extra cleanup. I've not found any problems with build or tests, hence why I checked this in. Is there something I've missed? Is this causing problems somewhere? Paul
