On Thursday 28 June 2007 07:43:59 Andy Lester wrote: > At some point, INTERP must have meant something, no? Why was it > INTERP and not interp before?
As far as I remember, it's the same reason that the invocant in Perl 5 is sometimes $this, sometimes $self, and sometimes $o: inconsistency in the face of overwhelming choice. -- c
