Em Dom, 2010-02-21 às 21:09 -0800, Larry Wall escreveu:
> I now see that the most important determinant of DateTimes is
> neither the Dates nor the Times themselves, but which TZ you're in.
> I propose renaming Temporal to TZ, so we get TZ::Date, TZ::Time, etc,
> since they're all dependent primarily on exactly where on earth you
> are, which determines how civil (or incivil) your cultural time is.
> It will also tend to prevent people from assuming anything universal
> about such types.

This issue was addressed when we got into the difference between Instant
and DateTime.

The thing is, much like a Str can't be seen as a Buf without an
encoding... a Instant can't be seen as a Date without a timezone...

That's the barrier between Instant and DateTime, as currently stated at
S32/Temporal.pod...

Take a look at all the classes and roles declared there...

daniel

Reply via email to