On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 11:28 -0500, Will Coleda wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Guy Hulbert <gwhulb...@eol.ca> wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-22-02 at 17:57 +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote: > >> For a better comparison that takes in account the features as well see > >> http://www.modernperlbooks.com/mt/2010/07/an-accurate-comparison-of-perl-5-and-rakudo-star.html > > > > Thanks for posting this. > > > > Can I infer from this article that it is *rakudo*, which is slow, rather > > than parrot? I have the impression that I can compile perl6 down to > > parrot code and run that separately. If so, it will be interesting to > > benchmark both cases. > > > > -- > > --gh > > > > > > > > Parrot's speed & memory footprint can certainly be improved - it's not > all Rakudo.
Ok. So we'll want to implement algorithms in both perl6 and parrot assembler then. -- --gh
