[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> John Tobey wrote:
>
> > > Why is he bothering? A year to produce a prototype doesn't seem like a
> > > useful way to expend effort on something that isn't actually perl6.
> >
> > It is actually perl6 if/when it's finished.
>
> Right, so it isn't a community effort then, as you intend doing it all
> yourself.
I always welcome patches, suggestions, and constructive criticism.
And if somebody else wants the "maintainer" role, I'll be happy to let
them do that work for me. :-)
> > > I'm not saying it was. However I don't see how the proposal would aid
> > > the migration - after all what he is writing will be neither perl5 nor
> > > perl6.
> >
> > I am not "writing". I am "transforming".
>
> Ok, so neither is it a rewrite. I suspect it won't be called perl6 in
> any case.
Well, if not, I'll have the satisfaction of having tried.
Cheers
-John
