>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> I'd definitely rather perl not do any sort of explicit user-level locking.
DS> That's not our job, and there be dragons.
Please explain how this is possible?
Does this mean that without user specifying a lock, perl will allow
a chaotic update pattern to be visible to the user?
thread A thread B
push(@foo, $bar); ++$bar;
or
$foo{$bar} = $baz; delete $foo{$bar++};
Will there be some sort of coherence here?
<chaim>
--
Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Steven W McDougall
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Thre... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight ... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwei... Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwei... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwei... Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwei... Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwei... Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightwei... Alan Burlison
