>>>>> "NI" == Nick Ing-Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NI> Chaim Frenkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: NI> Well if you want to place that restriction on perl6 so be it but in perl5 NI> I can say NI> tie $a[4],'Something'; That I didn't realize. NI> Indeed that is exactly how tied arrays work - they (automatically) add NI> 'p' magic (internal tie) to their elements. Hmm, I always understood a tied array to be the _array_ not each individual element. NI> Tk apps to this all the time : NI> $parent->Lable(-textvariable => \$somehash{'Foo'}); NI> The reference is just to get the actual element rather than a copy. NI> Tk then ties the actual element so it can see STORE ops and up date NI> label. Would it be a loss to not allow the elements? The tie would then be to the aggregate. I might argue that under threading tieing to the aggregate may be 'more' correct for coherency (locking the aggregate before accessing.) <chaim> -- Chaim Frenkel Nonlinear Knowledge, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-718-236-0183
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Uri Guttman
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Alan Burlison
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Chaim Frenkel
- Re: RFC 178 (v2) Lightweight Threads Dan Sugalski