Dan Sugalski wrote: > > Well, damn. And I mean that sincerely. :( I don't think it's that big a deal. Easy enough to wrap in a macro. -- John Porter
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} trying to understand this..... John van V
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} trying to understand t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} trying to understa... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} trying to unde... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} trying to ... Russ Allbery
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} tryin... Simon Cozens
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STIL... John Porter
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STIL... Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STIL... John Porter
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STIL... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} tryin... Nicholas Clark
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} t... Dan Sugalski
- Re: RFC 334 (v1) I'm {STILL} trying to ... David L. Nicol
- Perl's parser and lexer will likely be in Perl ... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl's parser and lexer will likely be ... Leon Brocard
- Larry's ALS talk Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Larry's ALS talk Jeff Okamoto