On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 11:22:35AM -0500, John Porter wrote:
> [C++]
> It's nearly as portable,
Uhm. Is this actually true? C runs pretty much anywhere.
Are there any non-fragile implementations of C++ yet?
> nearly as fast,
Why have nearly as fast, when you can have as fast?
> and WAY WAY BETTER to code in.
And WAY WAY LESS FAMILIAR to most coders here, at a guess.
C is a lingua franca. Let's try and deliberately *lower* the barrier of entry,
rather than forcing people to pole-vault.
That said, C++ does have *something* going for it.
Or at least, I suppose it must have.
--
As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name.
-- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C envi... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 compatibility with non-C enviornm... Hildo Biersma
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Piers Cawley
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Nicholas Clark
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) Simon Cozens
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) John Porter
- documenting interfaces (was Re: Meta-design) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Roland Giersig
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-design... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-de... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-de... Bradley M. Kuhn
