Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > You seem hell-bent to gain popularity and support, don't you. Do I? "Hell-bent"? When it comes right down to it, the likelihood that I personally will contribute to the core is vanishingly small, regardless of language. So, I guess you can defend your own choice of poison. > I believe you, I'm happy for you, but that's really irrelevant. Well, yes; one data point is statistically irrelevant, without a doubt. > you > are taking Perl away from the people who want to use Perl on that > platform. As simple as that. Almost. You're potentially taking away Perl6, which is vaporware. I wonder: In what order will the following exist on Handheld Device Foo: - C - C++ - Java - Perl6 -- John Porter
- Re: Perl6 in Java? (was Re: Meta-design) John Porter
- documenting interfaces (was Re: Meta-design) Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Roland Giersig
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Meta-d... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Me... Dan Sugalski
- Re: Perl6 on handhelds (was Re: Me... Bradley M. Kuhn
- Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens
- Re: Meta-design Sam Tregar
- Re: Meta-design John Porter
- Re: Meta-design Nicholas Clark
- Call for apprentice: was Re: Meta-design Simon Cozens