At 01:05 PM 12/29/00 +0000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: >Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >I'm reasonably certain that all platforms that perl will ultimately run on > >can muster hardware support for 16-bit integers. > >Hmm, most modern RISCs are very bad at C-like 16-bit arithmetic - they have >a tendency to widen to 32-bits. That's fine. I was thinking of smaller processors that might be used in embedded apps and such. (I'm also not sure what's the most efficient integer representation on things like the ARM microprocessors are) Dan --------------------------------------"it's like this"------------------- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
- Re: standard representations Damien Neil
- Re: standard representations Hildo Biersma
- Re: standard representations Damien Neil
- Re: standard representations Hildo Biersma
- Re: standard representations Damien Neil
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Damien Neil
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Nick Ing-Simmons
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Andy Dougherty
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski
- Re: standard representations Uri Guttman
- Re: standard representations Dan Sugalski