>>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> U doesn't really signal "glyph" to me, but we are sort of limited DS> in what we have left. We still need a zero-width assertion for DS> glyph boundary within regexes themselves. how about \C? it doesn't seem to be taken and would mean char boundary (not exactly a glyph but close enough). also \U has a meaning in double quotish strings. uri -- Uri Guttman --------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com SYStems ARCHitecture, Software Engineering, Perl, Internet, UNIX Consulting The Perl Books Page ----------- http://www.sysarch.com/cgi-bin/perl_books The Best Search Engine on the Net ---------- http://www.northernlight.com
- Re: Unicode handling Hong Zhang
- Re: Unicode handling Nicholas Clark
- RE: Unicode handling Garrett Goebel
- RE: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- RE: Unicode handling NeonEdge
- RE: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Damien Neil
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Uri Guttman
- Re: Unicode handling Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Unicode handling Hong Zhang
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Bryan C. Warnock
- Re: Unicode handling Hong Zhang
- Re: Unicode handling Jarkko Hietaniemi
- Re: Unicode handling nick
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski
- Re: Unicode handling Dan Sugalski