At 02:27 PM 3/23/2001 -0500, Uri Guttman wrote:
> >>>>> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> DS> U doesn't really signal "glyph" to me, but we are sort of limited
> DS> in what we have left. We still need a zero-width assertion for
> DS> glyph boundary within regexes themselves.
>
>how about \C? it doesn't seem to be taken and would mean char boundary (not
>exactly a glyph but close enough).
That's got the unfortunate mental association with C's char for lots of
folks, and I know I'd probably get it stuck to codepoint rather than glyph
if I didn't use it much.
>also \U has a meaning in double quotish strings.
>
>uri
>
>--
>Uri Guttman --------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- http://www.sysarch.com
>SYStems ARCHitecture, Software Engineering, Perl, Internet, UNIX Consulting
>The Perl Books Page ----------- http://www.sysarch.com/cgi-bin/perl_books
>The Best Search Engine on the Net ---------- http://www.northernlight.com
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
