At 01:54 PM 9/9/2001 -0700, Wizard wrote:
>Just curious, would it be practical to design-in a boolean-specific
>register/set of registers? There are many processors (PICC, 8051, etc.)
>which would likely be better able utilize their own optimizations if this
>were the case ( bitset, testbit, high, low, etc.). It could be done without
>the register(s), but implementation would be much more straight-forward.
Could you go into more detail? I'm not sure what you're getting at here,
but it sounds potentially interesting.
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... Michael G Schwern
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... Brent Dax
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental on... John Siracusa
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Buddha Buck
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Wizard
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Bart Lateur
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Uri Guttman
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Dan Sugalski
- RE: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Wizard
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Brian Wheeler
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Bryan C . Warnock
- Re: Math functions? (Particularly transcendental ones) Brian Wheeler
